CLOTHES MAKE THE MAN AND WOMAN

MOTHER OF ACTIVE DUTY SOLDIER Destroys Hillary’s Anti-Trump Muslim Dad

Only a military mom could write such a fantastic testimony and rebuke to the Muslim pawn used by Hillary’s campaign at the Dem Convention to trash Donald Trump.  The Facebook letter below is so great and so powerful that it has gone viral.   We hope you will read and share because it’s time to support our military 100% in this war against terror!

To the Muslim Gold Star father who spoke at the DNC …

I have some thoughts on your comments.  I am a Blue Star mother.  My deepest condolences on the loss of your son.  No family should have to endure such a loss.  That being said … while your son is a hero, you Sir, are NOT.   My son has served three tours of combat in the countries you and your family came from.   Iraq and Afghanistan were his introduction to adulthood and service to something bigger than our individual selves.  He was blown up by an IED set by your countrymen.   His Purple Heart is a testament to his love of America and our freedoms.  I have suffered through his multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan … never knowing from moment to moment if he would return home in a flag draped coffin.  It is torture when a mother wakes up to this day after day and sees the atrocities happening over there on the news and being helpless to change a thing. 

My comments to you will probably offend you.  I do not apologize.  These things need to be said.  Unlike you, I could NEVER use my son’s death as a pawn piece in support of a woman that left “America’s treasure” (Hillary’s words) to die unaided in Benghazi.  The same woman who says vile things to her military details there to protect her.   You, Sir, are supposed to be a witness to your son’s bravery and sacrifice.   Instead you stood on a stage and promoted the woman who upholds the very people that killed your son.   You became a political PAWN that promotes pandering to our enemy. You desecrated your son’s memory by your words.  You did not utter one word of outrage at anyone but Donald Trump.   Are you forgetting that Trump did not kill your son?   He had nothing whatsoever to do with these wars.   His memory should mean more to you than five minutes of fame on the stage of the party that voted to send your son to war.   The same party that for eight years has denied and cheated our veterans out of their deserved medical care.   Who for the last three years has cut our veterans pay.

Of note … your wife stood SILENT.   She stood with her head covered, never uttering a word about her loss.   She submitted to you being her voice in front of the country.  She abdicated her free voice to you … as would any good Sharia wife and mother.   Let me say, this was not lost on the other American military moms … myself included.   Had it been my son being “used” as a political PROP, no one could have silenced me.   I would be voicing my grief, my pride, my love of him to the world.   A man cannot speak to a mother’s loss.  No man knows her heart at the loss of a child.  She did her heroic son a disservice by her silence.   She should have uncovered her head and her heart to be the American mother you claim.

And last if all … you dared to flash your picket Constitution and ask if Trump has read it.   I dare to ask you, Sir… HAVE YOU READ IT?  If you say yes, then I dare ask you HOW you could represent that party?   HOW can you support this woman?   How can you affiliate your family with a party and candidate that cannot even call the radicals that killed your son what they are?   How can you support a current administration that diminishes your son’s death by denying he had an enemy?   And if you have read our Constitution, how could you cover your soulmate in colorful submissive sheets and have the audacity to speak FOR her?   Your son died for that Constitution you so carelessly waved around on national TV in support of the very party that exists to destroy it.

As a soldier’s mother … NO ONE could ever speak for me.   I find your outrage artificial.  I find your party affiliation offensive.  I find your wife’s silence atrocious and offensive.   I find YOU a political FOOL.   I find your son to have been your greatest accomplishment, and you, Sir, have dishonored him.   I hope you memorize that pocket Constitution so you will understand what it means to be a REAL American and hero.   You are not one.   You were USED.   Your son WOULD NOT be proud of you. My only hope is that when MY son goes a fourth time to combat radical Islamic terrorists (and he WILL), he will know that his mother never stood submissively SILENT about an American hero.   Yes, your son was a hero who could not be manipulated, but you, Sir, are a weak minded FOOL.

I would love to hear your thoughts this morning about the 1500 American soldiers on the air base in Turkey being held as basic hostages as I type.   Not a word from this president or party you adore … or the media that so thoroughly manipulated and used you and your wife.   So … what say you, Sir???   What will you say to a Blue and Gold Star family if these heroes die?   In my opinion, you will say NOTHING.

================================================
Schools Failing Taxpayers at More Than $18,000 Per Year

Terence Jeffrey · Aug. 10, 2016

In Philadelphia, where the Democratic Party held its national convention, the public schools spent a total of $18,241 per student in the 2011-2012 school year, according to the U.S. Department of Education.

In Detroit, where Donald Trump gave a speech on his economic policies this week, the public schools spent a total of $18,361 per student that year.

In Washington, D.C., where the federal government makes its home, it was $23,980.

What did these schools produce while spending more than $18,000 per student? Not well-educated children.

In the Philadelphia public schools in 2015, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress scores published by the Department of Education, 80 percent of eighth graders were not grade-level proficient in math. Eighty-four percent were not grade-level proficient in reading.

In the Detroit public schools, 96 percent of eighth graders were not grade-level proficient in math. Ninety-three percent were not grade-level proficient in reading.

In the District of Columbia public schools, 83 percent of the eighth graders were not grade-level proficient in math. Eighty-one percent were not grade-level proficient in reading.

If you pay federal taxes — no matter where you live and no matter where you send your children to school — you help subsidize the public schools in Philadelphia, Detroit and Washington, D.C.

In fact, if you pay federal taxes you help subsidize the public schools all across America.

In 2012-2013 school year, according to the Department of Education’s Digest of Educational Statistics, public elementary and secondary schools took in approximately $603,686,987,000 in revenues. About $55,862,552,000 of that — or 9.3 percent — came from the federal government.

Another $273,101,724,000 — or 45.2 percent — came from state government, and $274,722,710,000 — or 45.5 percent — came from local sources.

Nationwide, public elementary and secondary schools spent $12,010 per student in the 2011-2012 school year. But, in 2015, 68 percent of public-school eighth graders nationwide were not grade-level proficient in math and 67 percent were not grade-level proficient in reading.

In the National Assessment of Educational Progress test in reading in 2015, Catholic school eighth-graders on average outscored public school eighth-graders by 20 points — 284 to 264.

In math, Catholic school eighth-graders on average outscored public school eighth-graders by 12 points — 293 to 281.

Yet in the 2011-2012 school year, according to the Digest of Educational Statistics, the average tuition at a Catholic elementary school was $5,330; the average tuition at a Catholic secondary school was $9,790, and the average tuition at a Catholic school that combined elementary and secondary schools was $10,230.

That is less than $12,010 that public elementary and secondary schools spent per student that year.

The cost and the poor performance of public schools in the United States should inspire Congress to do two things: Shut down the federal Department of Education and enact legislation creating complete school choice for families that reside in the District of Columbia.

Voters in states and local communities elsewhere in the country can then decide for themselves whether or not to replace the relatively small percentage of local school revenue that now comes from the federal government.

But the right decision would be for states and local communities to stop giving their education money exclusively to government-run schools.

Instead, they should give that money to parents — and let parents decide where to send their children to school.

Communities should grant every child in their jurisdiction a voucher worth the same amount of money currently spent per pupil in the local government schools. Then they should let families decide whether they want to send their children to one of those government schools or to a private school.

They should let parents decide not only who will teach their children reading and mathematics but also who will cooperate with them in teaching their children what is right and what is wrong.

The Obama administration is now trying to use that small percentage of public school funding that comes from the federal government to force local public schools to cooperate in advancing the administration’s vision of transgenderism.

But American schools do not need transgender bathrooms and locker rooms. They need the complete transformation that will come by getting the federal government entirely out of primary and secondary education and giving all parents unfettered school choice.
===================================================================================

Word for word from the Cornell Law Library

Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton's private email server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding any federal office.

Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here's what it says:

“(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states "shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

Shouldn't voters know that? The media won't tell them. So it's up to us. Can you help hold Hillary accountable?  Pass this on, please.

============================================================

President of Muslim majority Kyrgyzstan sparks outrage by saying: “Women in mini-skirts don’t become suicide bombers”

President Almazbek Atambayev (right) said women in his country had been wearing short skirts for decades ‘and none of them thought about wearing an explosive belt.’ Kyrgyzstan isn’t the only former Soviet bloc country that has put restrictions on the practice of Islam, despite having Muslim majorities.

The SUN  (h/t Liz) “Women who wear full Islamic garb are more likely to become terrorist suicide bombers,” Kyrgyzstan Almazbek Atambayeva Central Asian leader has claimed. 

The premier was making the comments to journalists during a national debate on cultural identity in Kyrgyzstan, where 80% of the population is Muslim. President Atambayev attacked those who criticise females for wearing less traditional clothing.

The debate was held amid weeks of controversy over government-sponsored adverts in the capital Bishkek encouraging women not to wear orthodox Muslim items such as the hijab, niqab and burka.

The hoardings showed contrasting photos of women in traditional Kyrgyzstan clothing alongside those in Islamic veils. The caption reads: “Poor people! Where are we heading to?”

President Atambayev said: “When we erected banners some smart people appeared and started pointing at miniskirts. “Our women have been wearing miniskirts since 1950s, and they never thought about wearing an explosive belt.

“You can wear even tarpaulin boots on your head, but do not organize bombings. “This is not religion. Let them wear even miniskirts but there must not be any blasts.”

The president described the wearing of Islamic dress as potentially dangerous. He said. “Terrorists are insane people. “Clothes also can change one’s thoughts sometimes.

==================================================