STUPID VOTERS

To Lar of Galen: If the immigration system is broken and “reform” is SO important, why didn’t BO take action back in 2009 when the Demoncrats controlled both the Executive and Legislative branches?  Why did he wait not only until after his re-election but, after the recent mid-terms to act? 

Answer by Lar of Galen:  He knew how unpopular it was and didn’t want to screw up the Dems chances.  But, now that they’re all lame ducks, why not?? He has nothing to lose.  And it’s not like the Repubicans are going to do anything except fuss and fume.  It’s just like Obamacare.  It was/is hugely unpopular, but the system was “broken” and had to be “reformed” RIGHT NOW!!  It passed in 2010 (without a single Repubican vote) but, the initial provisions didn’t start kicking in until 2013, after his re-election.  And the major provisions kept being delayed until (all together now) after the mid-terms.  The economy, government restrictions and taxes will all get much worse now.  There’s no need for any pretense at this point.  Unfortunately, it may be too late for the majority of Americans to wake up and realize that the water is boiling. IF we have a chance of saving the nation, it will take 15 – 20 years to undo the damage that has been done.

Lar of Galen on Immigration: And since it is in vogue to be offended by other people’s words not complying with your own unique definition, I am offended that we keep referring to invaders from foreign countries as “immigrants”. Some of my ancestors were immigrants and they came here legally and melded into the American culture. They didn’t sneak in with a half dozen or more relatives, have children, then cry about not getting enough freebies paid for by the tax payers and demand that we assimilate to their culture.

Lar of Galen on race issues: This “pastor” (Dyson) tries to equate police killing a criminal in self defense to blacks murdering each other.  He and his fellow race-baiters push the idea that cops (white cops in particular) are out there every day gunning down young men just for being black. I can’t remember the actual statistics but, the police in the U.S. are called to thousands of crime scenes every day, and rarely do they pull their guns.  And only a fraction of a percent of the time do they shoot anyone. I think it’s about 20 times a year that police have to use deadly force.  The fact that around 70% of crimes are committed by blacks makes it inevitable that the majority of the bad guys killed by police are black.  And since most police forces are about 50% white, it is most likely that the “offending” officer is white.  So, a few times a year, a white cop shoots and kills a black thug somewhere in the US.  Over 99% of these fatalities are completely justified and necessary for the officer’s and society’s safety. Still, they are by far the exception and, are as much an “epidemic of racial bigotry” as the Republicans are waging war on women.  If a black officer kills a black thug, there might be some cries of police brutality. But, if a black kills a white – whether police are involved in the situation or not – it hardly ever is reported in the news. And if it does make the news, the race angle is almost never  mentioned.  The Negro family was destroyed by LBJ’s “Great Society” which told blacks they were all victims and eliminated any need for them to be responsible for their own actions.  In a short time, the illegitimacy rate for blacks rose to 73% and it has remained close to that mark ever since.  Without a working father and stay-at-home mother, black children are no longer raised, just produced in large numbers then fed and clothed – usually at the tax-payers expense.  Generation after generation have been convinced of their victimhood and believe they are “owed”.  I think this entire nation is going to have to wander in the desert for at least 40 years before we have a chance to get ourselves straight.  BTW: Dyson told Giuliani “Your attitude just makes the problem worse” because Giuliani dared to cite facts.

We’ve heard from Michael Brown’s mother, Michael Brown’s father, his stepfather, every race-baiter and hosts of POSTs on the street about the “injustice” of a white cop “getting away with” shooting an unarmed (6’4” 290 lb.) teenager (who was about to beat him unconscious and maybe to death). How come we’ve NEVER heard from the parents of Officer Wilson? What about his mother’s feelings knowing that her son was doing his job to protect the community and is being threatened for acting in self defense? Why isn’t she ever given a voice.

Listening to Rush, he pointed out that it is black businesses being destroyed in the “protests”. He also played a sound bite of a black female CNN reporter talking to Al Sharpton. She related that there were “all kinds of police, all kinds of uniforms, many in military-style equipment” outside the police station. But, when she went to the neighborhood where the Brown shooting occurred, she expected to see a massive police presence with checkpoints but, found NO police at all. And of course, that’s where most of the violence occurred. She asks Sharpton “Do you think the authorities allowed Ferguson to burn?” Al naturally jumped at the chance to confirm this hypothesis, all of which garnered strong vocal approval of the audience. Rush pointed out that if there had been a police presence there, the police would have been accused of provoking violence so they could exercise some more racially motivated brutality.  Rush then stated that the reporterette then asked Sharpton if the Feds could still try Officer Wilson (ala’ Rodney King) and that really got Al and the crowd going. Sadly, a majority of blacks, being obamanites, do not care about facts. They only care about getting vengeance against The Man.

LAR OF GALEN RETURNS...

(New American Standard)

Luke – Chapter 12

54   And He was also saying to the multitudes, “When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, ‘A shower is coming’, and so it turns out.

55  And when you see a south wind blowing, you say, ‘It will be a hot day’, and it turns out that way.

56   You hypocrites! You know how to analyze the appearance of the earth and the sky, but why do you not analyze this present time?

57  And why do you not even on your own initiative judge what is right?”

POST ELECTION REDS...

\\\\

Liberal Logic: A Contradiction in Terms 

Written on Friday, November 7, 2014 by David L. Goetsch 

As a debater in college, I learned to build my arguments on logic, reason, and facts, but I also learned that trying to use logic with a liberal is like trying to change a flat tire with a shovel. It doesn’t work. Anybody who debates one will soon discover that to a liberal logic, reason, and facts are just inconvenient things that get in the way of their preconceived notions. Hence, the tendency of liberals to simply ignore these things as well as anything else that does not comport with their biased presuppositions. 

I still debate liberals—more often than I would like—but I no longer try to convince or convert them. Better to simply let them look ridiculous tying themselves in knots with their self-inflicted contradictions—something they are quite good at. Be forewarned though, liberals have a high tolerance for their own stupidity. They are not easily embarrassed or shamed. In fact, they typically do not even see the illogic and contradictions in their convoluted thinking. In this column, I review some of the loony contradictions liberals can, with a straight face, espouse and often do. 

I begin with the issue of life. Liberals are staunch advocates of protecting life, wildlife that is. But they aren’t too keen on protecting human life. For example, you can be sent to federal prison for two years and fined up to $250,000 for destroying an eagle’s egg, but there is no punishment—not even a slap on the hand—for destroying an unborn human baby in its mother’s womb. I have pointed out this and similar contradictions about the issue of life to liberals for years, but have never had even one admit to any contradiction in protecting wildlife while killing human life. Somehow in their muddled minds an eagle’s egg is a baby eagle to be protected, but an unborn baby is just tissue. How would you like to be trapped in a situation in which the only person who can save you is a liberal, but to save you he has to use logic and reason? I can summarize your fate in three short words: you are toast. 

I have also debated liberals many times on the issue of values. You can learn a lot about an individual’s values by what they think is acceptable public behavior. For example, liberals support same-sex marriage and have no problem with two men making out in public. However, liberals have a major problem with little school children holding hands and saying a prayer at their desk (although their concern over prayer in public schools somehow does not apply to Muslim students). Where is the logic in this? Engaging in public displays of gay sex is acceptable but public prayer isn’t? 

When debating liberals on the issue of values, it is interesting to ask them what it is they really value. What is the value they hold dear that says same-sex marriage is acceptable, but public prayer for children is not? Liberals respond to this by claiming they value free choice between consenting adults. Really? Why then can’t consenting adult Christians display their beliefs in the public square without having to fight the ACLU? What is it that liberals value that makes abortion on demand take precedence over the life of an unborn child? Once again liberals respond to this question by claiming they are for “choice.” Really? What about the other choices that could have been made prior to the woman getting pregnant, choices such as abstinence or birth control. What about choice for the unborn babies who cannot yet speak for themselves. What if unborn babies could somehow speak? I wonder how many would say: “Sure, go ahead and kill me mom. I know I am an inconvenience to you.” 

What does it say about their true values when liberals publically espouse tolerance but are blatantly intolerant of views that do not comport with their own? It seems to me that the only values liberals really hold dear are self-centeredness and control. They self-servingly value whatever makes them feel good or serves their agenda at the moment, and they use government coercion to control what the rest of us are supposed to think, do, and say about those things. Liberals are tolerant alright—of their own views, but nothing else. 

Liberals just love to label people who disagree with them as “racists.” With Barack Obama in the White House that means that 55 percent of Americans must be racists since that is the percentage of Americans who disagree with his policies and think he is doing an inadequate job. Think of Congress and tell me who acts more like racists. There is a Congressional Black Caucus made up of Black members of the House of Representatives. This is a group of elected officials whose members choose to segregate themselves on the basis of race. There is no Congressional White Caucus. Liberals have no problem with the existence of a Black Congressional Caucus but they would quickly label a White Congressional Caucus a bunch of racists. Yet, there is no contradiction in this to a liberal. 

Sometimes it seems that you have to be a criminal or a thug to win favor with liberals. For example, recall that President Obama openly mourned the death of Trayvon Martin, claiming the young man looked like the son he never had. Let’s review some facts about Trayvon Martin. He was a drug user and a thief who was headed down the wrong path in life when he was killed by a neighborhood watch volunteer who he assaulted. But there is another young black man close to Martin’s age who President Obama never mentions. Jaron Holliday was homeschooled, a devout Christian, an accomplished classical pianist, and a corporal in the United State Army who died serving his country. Not only does this outstanding young American apparently not look like Obama’s son, he doesn’t even rate a mention from the president. 

Consider the issue of talk radio. Liberals hate talk radio because the only successful talk radio programs are conservative. The liberal answer to Rush Limbaugh and company is NPR. Liberals want conservative talk radio programs such as Rush Limbaugh’s to be banned or regulated out of existence. At the same time, they think NPR should be subsidized by American taxpayers, most of whom do not listen to NPR and would not if it were the only radio station on the air. But asking a liberal about this blatant contradiction is like asking them about the quadratic equation. They don’t have a clue.

 

The hard truth is this: Liberals are intolerant, illogical, unreasonable, biased, and immune to facts. You cannot reason with liberals because they believe only what serves their selfish agenda at the moment, but you cannot just ignore them either. Why? Because they are using the federal government to force their point of view on the rest of us. It would be one thing if liberals still operated according to their mantra of the 1960s: You do your thing and I’ll do mine, but they don’t. They now want to do their thing and force you to do it too. What a world.

 

TWO AMERICAS BY BOB LONSBERRY

TWO AMERICAS
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas.
The America that works, and the America that doesn’t. The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t. It’s not the haves and the have nots, it’s the dos and the don’ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, to obey the law and support themselves and contribute to society, and others don’t. That’s the divide in America. It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility. It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That’s not invective, that’s truth. And it’s about time someone said it. The politics of envy was on proud display last week as the president said he would pledge the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.” He notes that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not just. It was the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat. It is the electoral philosophy that gave us Detroit. It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America. And it conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense. It ends up not being a benefit to the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them – in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victimhood and anger instead of ability and hope. The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to ignore and cheat the law of choices and consequences. It seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices. Because, by and large, the variability in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. And success and failure can manifest themselves in personal and family income. You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course, you have them in wedlock and life is apt to take another course. Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take. My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome. But, our lives also have had an inequality of effort. Whereas my doctor went to college and then gave the flower of his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice. And our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine. Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are both free men. And in a free society, free choices will lead to different outcomes. It is not inequality Barack Obama will take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. And there is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure. The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort. The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get.” The progressive movement would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement has replaced effort as the key to upward mobility in American society. Or at least it has if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive and fosters equality through mediocrity. He and his party speak of two Americas. And their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. And by the false philosophy that says one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization. What the president offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and strife, he pitted one set of Americans against another. For his own political benefit. That’s what progressives offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow. Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
- by Bob Lonsberry © 2013

EBOLA

WEREWOLVES BY LAR OF GALEN

No, this isn’t about Halloween.  It’s about radical Muslims.  Everytime a jihadist attacks someone in the west, there is a concerted effort by the media to deny that it is an act of terrorism.  When they do admit that it is terrorism, they do their best to insulate the Islamic religion, saying this person was a Lone Wolf, not a true representative of the religion of peace.  They then like to imply that it is our fault they became radicalized. A lengthy Canadian article about the Ontario Parliament shooter devotes most of its time recounting the poor, downtrodden man’s lengthy struggle against cocaine addiction.  He became susceptible to radicalization only because society failed him. But what about the man in New York that attacked the cops with a hatchet? He was a college graduate, and had been hired to teach college.  He wasn’t some homeless vuhnuble (that’s “vulnerable” – underprivileged – in Sheila Jackson Lee speech).  We have even had privileged high school girls wanting to go join ISIS. In discussing this situation during his early segment, Rush Limbaugh asked “Who is radicalizing our young people?” 

     The answer is the school system and entire entertainment and “information” industries, all of which have been taken over by radical liberalism.  There have always been liberals, progressives, socialists in our society.  But they have become The System since the 1960s.  Anyone under the age of 50 has been constantly inundated with propaganda from virtually all quarters their entire lives. They have been constantly told that America is horrible, cruel, racist, and the primary source of evil in this world.  And the majority of people today don’t know enough about current events, much less history, to question or refute this drumbeat.  I can’t recall a personal experience of official socialist propaganda until I got to college, but Deborah experienced high school teachers attacking and ridiculing religious/conservative students in the classroom – when their discourse hadnothing to do with the subject they were supposed to be teaching.  And she graduated in 1972 -- just 2 years behind me.  I remember an incident in 1996. I was telling another adult that I intended to vote for Bob Dole, and an 11-year-old who was overhearing this conversation suddenly interjected “BOB DOLE IS A RACIST!” I was so shocked that I couldn’t help but respond “WHERE IN THE WORLD DID YOU GET THAT IDEA?!”  I didn’t get any answer except a pout, but you know it came from school. 

     This situation reminds me – like most historical lessons – of World War II.  Towards the end of the war, the Nazis launched “Case Werwolf” (Operation Werewolf).  Young men (mostly boys, actually) were trained to commit acts of sabotage, assassination, and terrorism -- which was designed to drive the occupying forces out and allow the Nazis to eventually return to power.  They were able to find a considerable number of willing recruits, despite the fact that Germany had been thoroughly devastated. The Boy Scouts and other youth organizations had been banned in favor of the Hitler Jugend (Hitler Youth), so by 1945 you couldn’t find a person in their teens who had any memory of anything but Nazi propaganda. And they didn’t have the internet. So, when you hear assurances that the latest attack was an isolated incidence, not confirmed to be linked toradical Islam (despite ISI claims they have fighters everywhere who are taking the fight to the West in their own homes), you should think . . . .

WEREWOLVES 

Guest Writer...Hope Lee...

It seems that there are far too many in the land we call America, who need to be educated, not in the sense of schooling per say but, with the knowledge and understanding of what America really stands for, on the eternal scale of things, I’ll attempt to clarify, please be patient.  There seems to be a misconception of sorts in this Republic we call, the United States of America, that all one has to do is call themselves an American and they are entitled to vast resources of government aid, community services, medical resources, parenting and cure alls for every other self induced issue one has produced.

Let’s look at this misconception and try to paint a proper picture of just what this Republic stands for and the expectations to continue as THE one Nation on this planet that has continued to sacrifice for those who can’t, won’t or have no knowledge of what it takes to live as free people, with liberties and rights and self awareness, all in lieu of individual accountability.

Individual accountability, seems to be to some, an alien state of mind, something that gets in the way of freedoms…in other words, there are far too many who would like nothing better than to go about their selfish business of, what they call living, or life, yet never give a second thought to what their actions do to others, what their thoughts, do to those around them; to be perfectly clear, there are far too many, so called humans, who care nothing for being accountable for their actions, in any way.

The only analogy that can be used to relate with this mindset would be that these so called humans are really walking, talking, maggots of any free society, feeding off their host, fattening themselves from the very source of life, they care nothing about.  The problem with this mindset, is when the host is devoured, not replenished, both are dead, never to be as they were.

This reality has been realized in this country and has manifested itself in many forms; some call it politics, some call it racism, some actually call it justice…let’s be clear, whatever name it’s given …it’s still not the path to any form of happiness, respect, truth or honor as we humans have come to know as what is needed in any free society.  It’s a slow death, nothing else.  Its expecially, in no way the mindset nor qualification’s to call oneself an American.  


We have, at this time in history, the worse case scenario related to American politics.  Case in point, the one named Barack Hussein Obama and his campaign to act the maggot feeding off all true Americans and our way of life; to feed his thirst for hatred, division, racism, treason, diversion, blame, inhumanity…yet he appeals to a vast audience of those who have everything to hide, as he does..from truth, from honesty, from true human values, from accountability in every form of that word.

Politics today, in itself is a dirty business, the very name “politics”, donates to the notion of Who’s in charge?  Who has the final word?.  Who does this apply to?  How can I get mine?  Why is their share more than mine?...and so on.
Politics of old, as our countries framers saw fit, was survival, survival of a Republic, not individual greed and favoritism; to them it was a means to survival for all; for the Republic to stand as one, against all who would seek its demise; hence they committed themselves to write these conditions, rules, and values in the form of a Constitution; to be adhered to by the political branch of society; any free society, that chooses to be forward thinking and prosperous…FOR ALL!

Now this Republic is faced with the reality of world war, whether it is on the religious front, or the military chest bumping between nations, our most important issue historically, will be recognizing the resident evil existing in our White House, how it got there, and how to remove this infection, before it’s too late.  That resident evil is called Barack Hussein Obama, “ the go it alone”, “I don’t need no stinking Constitution”, anti-American, who thinks this next diversion called ISIS will give him yet more time to harm our Republic, by executive lawlessness and treason.

Time has come for the United States Congress to act the part, or lay down…and if they choose the latter, we have little hope of defeating this infection.  Generations of good Americans will realize this time in history as the weak, complacent, spiritual death of America as we true Americans know of it…and this, by his actions alone prove to be, the goals of this fanatical Muslim called Obama, the complete destruction of the United States of America, from within.

Now that folks is the true “HOPE AND CHANGE”, SOME OF YOU FOOLS VOTED FOR!!!