Friday, August 23, 2019

TOLEDO, I MEAN DAYTON











=======================================================================








========================================================================
















========================================================================









=======================================================================


Lar of Galen...The Constitution authorizes the death penalty, naturally.  It just prohibits "cruel and unusual" punishment -- which was aimed at the abuses colonists suffered at the hands of the English, primarily their military.  It doesn't mean you can't hang a criminal because he suffers "mental anguish" about the probable loss of bowel control after being publicly hanged.  It shows the insanity of liberalism that people worry more about the feelings of deranged scum than they do about protecting society.
=============================================================
Lar of Galen...Why were taxpayers paying for abortions in the first place?  Oh, yes "Abortions are a minor part of the services provided by PP".  Sure.  Most their non-tax money came from selling baby parts.  But how did they get those baby parts?
 =============================================================




































==============================================================


































==============================================================



















==============================================================
Chicago gun statistics so far in 2019, with strictest gun laws in the US:

Shot & Killed: 226
Shot & Wounded: 1,236
Total Shot: 1,462...
Total Homicides: 277

Gun control means only the criminals have guns, and the citizens have no control
==============================================================




















==============================================================
















=============================================================













=============================================================








=============================================================
























=============================================================

















==============================================================
















============================================================
Lar of Galen:

I think Netanyahu is being petty.  Just because someone hates you and wants you to be exterminated is no reason to be disrespectful.  That's just plain racist, just like the Philadelphia police who were escorting people out of the area while under fire.  Pigs!  Of course, the poor "Palestinians" might not have much of a complaint if they had taken the original UN deal, and would stop firing rockets into Israel after they gave the Arabs land they had no obligation to give.




Lorra of Pville:

Netanyahu is a great man. Well done! 


Should have waited until they were airborne. Excuse us ladies and gentlemen the pilot regrets to announce that we have been denied landing rights due to the two douchettes sitting in row
___ seats _____.  Be sure to thank them as you deplane in Damascus Syria.

Netanyahu Skewers Tlaib, Omar In Statement On Why They Are Banned From Israel

Why should they be required to let in people leading a boycott against them? The boycotters have now been boycotted.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu:
No country in the world respects America and the American Congress more than the State of Israel.
As a free and vibrant democracy, Israel is open to critics and criticism, with one exception: Israeli law prohibits the entry into Israel of those who call for and work to impose boycotts on Israel, as do other democracies that prohibit the entry of people who seek to harm the country. In fact, in the past the US did this to an Israeli member of Knesset, as well as to other public figures from around the world.
Congresswomen Tlaib and Omar are leading activists in promoting the legislation of boycotts against Israel in the American Congress. Only a few days ago, we received their itinerary for their visit in Israel, which revealed that they planned a visit whose sole objective is to strengthen the boycott against us and deny Israel’s legitimacy. For instance: they listed the destination of their trip as Palestine and not Israel, and unlike all Democratic and Republican members of Congress who have visited Israel, they did not request to meet any Israeli officials, either from the government or the opposition.
A week ago, Israel warmly welcomed some 70 Democratic and Republican members of Congress, who expressed broad bipartisan support for Israel, which was also demonstrated a month ago in a resounding bipartisan vote against BDS in Congress.
However, the itinerary of the two Congresswomen reveals that the sole purpose of their visit is to harm Israel and increase incitement against it.
In addition, the organization that is funding their trip is Miftah, which is an avid supporter of BDS, and among whose members are those who have expressed support for terrorism against Israel.
Therefore, the minister of interior has decided not to allow their visit, and I, as prime minister, support his decision.
Nonetheless, if Congresswoman Tlaib submits a humanitarian request to visit her relatives, the minister of interior has announced that he will consider her request on the condition that she pledges not to act to promote boycotts against Israel during her visit.
===============================================================================


















































=============================================================================






 =====================================================================
















=====================================================================






























































=====================================================================




















===================================================================
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." —Federal Farmer (1787)
===================================================================
Lar of Galen...A retired Navy LtCdr called in to Hannity to point out the whole purpose of the 2nd Amendment was that citizens would have weapons that would be on par with the military so they could prevent government oppression.  It wasn't about hunting or even self-defense against criminals.  It was to protect us from the government if it ever turns against us.  As I have pointed out occasionally, when the 2nd Amendment was written, the militia was independent of the national military, and the people were carrying the same guns as the military.  So, the next time a person challenges the need for a civilian to have an "assault rifle" or a 100-round magazine (which is damned rare and expensive),  ....
=============================================================






















==============================================================



=============================================================












=============================================================










They used to call returning Vietnam vets, baby killers. Now, it's just women.
=================================================
Lar of Galen...Last night Tucker Carlson dedicated a segment on how the left has hijacked the English language.  Their goal is to eliminate debate by controlling the language. If you can't use certain terms, you can't argue against their views.  The most effective technique is to invert the meaning of words.  A terrorist attack by an Islamic extremist becomes "anti-Islamic activity".  How's that??? Well, if someone commits an act of violence that makes Islam look bad, it is actually anti-Islamic. Several local governments have eliminated the use of gender-specific pronouns (he, she, him, her, etc). But now, San Francisco has gone a step further with the linguistic obfuscation. The term "felon" has become the new "F word". Instead, you must say "justice-involved person". Of course, the victims of crime are also "justice-involved persons", so the perpetrator and recipient are now equal in the eyes of the law.   
    Mark Stein was invited to give his comments on this subject, and he -- in his usual slyly eloquent manner -- related his personal experience in this matter.  This language sanitization began with "illegal aliens".  Years ago, the media changed the term to "undocumented aliens", then progressed (pun intended) to "undocumented worker", then "migrant workers", then " undocumented immigrants", "dreamers", etc.   Mark stated that about 5 years ago he asked in a newspaper piece "Why not just say 'undocumented members of the American community'?".  Two years later, Harry Ried used the term "undocumented residents" on the floor of the Senate.

     Mark stated that the left's goal regarding the 2nd Amendment is to neutralize it and take away your guns. Likewise, they want to neutralize the 1st Amendment by taking away words. If you control language, you disarm the debate.  Of course,  if this tactic doesn't work and you still insist on trying to present an opposing view, you're a racist Nazi homophobe.

Blog Archive

Followers

Blog Archive