DIRTY SECRETS

NFL Great, Mike Ditka, Gets AXED By ESPN After Saying THIS About Obama

This is what happens when you say ANYTHING bad about our President in Obamaland. Do you think Mike Ditka should be able to voice his opinion without fear of backlash?

Mike Ditka will be replaced as a panelist on ESPN’s Sunday NFL Countdown, it has been revealed.

The announcement came less than a week after Ditka, both a former player and coach for the Chicago Bears, revealed he believed Barack Obama was the worst president ‘we’ve ever had’.

Ditka, who has been a main panelist for the ESPN show since 2006, said Obama was a ‘fine man’ but not a leader when he went on WABC’S The Bernie & Sid Show last Thursday.

‘He would be great to play golf with,’ Ditka continued.

‘He’s not a leader. This country needs leadership. It needs direction. It needs somebody that steps up front.’

‘We need somebody like Ronald Reagan. Everyone once in a while you’re gonna get punched in the chops but you keep going forward. There’s all there is to it.’ 

Ditka, who once described himself as ‘ultra-ultra-ultra conservative’, also revealed his vote in the 2016 election will likely go to GOP front-runner Donald Trump, according to the Washington Post.

‘They people that hate him, hate him, but people like him because he says things that resonate with what they think,’ he said.

‘If I were to vote tomorrow, I’d probably vote for Trump.’

This is hardly the first time Da Coach has spoken out against Da President.

In 2013 Ditka called not running against Obama in the Illinois 2004 Senate race the ‘biggest mistake’ he had ever made.

=============================================================

LAR OF GALEN MAKES A GREAT POINT: JUST in case I haven’t said this before:  When we entered Baghdad back in 2003, we found huge warehouses full of 55-gallon drums of chemicals that, when combined, produce nerve agent. But because they were marked as being for agricultural use, and because they weren’t toxic until combined, this was ignored by the media and the government.  Sodamn Insane used chemical agents against Iran in 1980, and against the Kurds after Desert Storm.  All this was forgotten and/or ignored because we didn’t find facilities to produce nuclear weapons. Yet, British intelligence kept telling us Iraq was working on nukes, and our satellites “saw” convoys taking equipment to Syria ahead of our invasion.  The “Bush Lied” narrative drowned out all the facts, and for some reason he didn’t take to the American people. I suspect W was silent because he had to make some deal to get funding for The War On Terror from the Democrat-controlled Congress.

============================================================================

March 5, 2016

The Dirty Little Secret about All-Electric Vehicles

By Dexter Wright

As Elon Musk doubles down with the debut of new and more affordable models of his Tesla all-electric vehicles at the Geneva Auto Show, there is a dirty little secret that once exposed, will burst the mythology of the all-electric car. There is a myth that the all-electric vehicle is more efficient than conventional vehicles and that big oil hates the all-electric niche carved out by Musk and others. The reality is that the all-electric vehicle is less efficient, and has a larger carbon footprint than a Ford F-150.  

It is not because the Tesla vehicles are not well engineered; they are superbly engineered. The inefficiency is a function of where the energy for the all-electric vehicle is generated. Let us start at the beginning. There are only two reliable zero emissions methods for generating power. The first is hydroelectric power which generates only 16% of the world’s electricity; the second is nuclear power, which makes up only 11% of the world’s electrical grid capacity. That means that 73% of worldwide electrical generation is from fossil fuels.

Looking at how the majority of electrical power is produced will give us the insight that could be embarrassing to the fans of all-electric vehicles. A fossil fuel fired power plant heats water into steam to turn a steam turbine which then turns a generator to produce power; that process is 37% efficient. That is to say 63% of the energy in a unit of fossil fuel is lost due to friction and other thermodynamic laws that have yet to be broken (or nullified by President Obama with an Executive Order).

But the power loss does not stop there. Between the power station and your local neighborhood charging station (which is harder to find than Hillary’s classified e-mails) there is a stepdown station where the 440 voltage in the transmission lines is converted to 220 volts. Then the 220-volt electricity travels along power lines to a transformer which converts the power to 110 volts before going to your meter and finally going from your meter to your home charging station. Each step along the way there is significant power loss. The total loss from the original 37% efficient steam turbine and generator is 66%. That is to say that two-thirds of the power generated is lost from electrical resistance and attenuation along the miles and miles of transmission and power lines. Subtracting two thirds from the original 37% leaves only 13.7%. Yes, my friends, the all-electric vehicle is only 13.7% efficient. The pollution and carbon emissions are simply moved from the tailpipe to the smokestack.

How does that compare with a regular run-of-the-mill internal combustion automobile?  According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency the efficiency of a typical car is 14% under city driving condition and close to 26% for ideal highway conditions. This means that those of us in a tax bracket that precludes buying an all-electric vehicle are polluting less than our neighbors with “Bernie” signs in their yards.

There is an additional little fact that Mr. Musk et al hope is not discovered; that is that most of the nuclear power stations in the U.S. will be shut down in the coming decades. The Department of Energy has no plans in the works to replace these zero emissions power plants. This, in combination with Obama’s war on coal, is shrinking the power grid which is at this time is already nearing 85% capacity. Not much room for market growth of a new electrical appliance called a car.

On paper the all-electric vehicle is a good idea, but in practice, not so much. Given these facts, Big Oil should be behind the all-electric vehicle; if Big Oil cares at all. The better idea is to continue along the lines of hybrid vehicles which can exploit the “sweet spot” of an engine and achieve significantly higher fuel efficiency and lower emissions than either the conventional internal combustion vehicle or the all-electric vehicle. Whether a series or a parallel hybrid vehicle, the fuel efficiency of a hybrid is superior to the all-electric vehicle. The electric car will just have to wait until major advancements in the area of power generation are achieved, but until then, the numbers just don’t add up, so I will smugly drive my Ford F-150 knowing that I am more fuel efficient than that all-electric vehicle with a Bernie bumper sticker on it.
========================================================================

COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America .
ABBOTT: Good Subject. Terrible Times. It’s 5.6%.
COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?
ABBOTT: No, that’s 23%. 
COSTELLO: You just said 5.6%.
ABBOTT: 5.6% Unemployed.
COSTELLO: Right 5.6% out of work. 
ABBOTT: No, that’s 23%.
COSTELLO: Okay, so it’s 23% unemployed.
ABBOTT: No, that’s 5.6%. 
COSTELLO: WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 5.6% or 23%?
ABBOTT: 5.6% are unemployed. 23% are out of work.
COSTELLO: If you are out of work you are unemployed. 
ABBOTT: No, Obama said you can’t count the “Out of Work”
as the unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.
COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!!! 
ABBOTT: No, you miss his point.
COSTELLO: What point?
ABBOTT: Someone who doesn’t look for work
can’t be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn’t be fair.
COSTELLO: To whom?
ABBOTT: The unemployed. 
COSTELLO: But ALL of them are out of work.
ABBOTT: No, the unemployed are actively looking for work. Those
who are out of work gave up looking and if you give up, you are no longer in
the ranks of the unemployed.
COSTELLO: So if you’re off the unemployment roles that would
count as less unemployment?
ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely!
COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don’t
look for work?
ABBOTT: Absolutely it goes down. That’s how it gets to
5.6%. Otherwise it would be 23%.
COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are two ways to
bring down the unemployment number? 
ABBOTT: Two ways is correct.
COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?
ABBOTT: Correct.
COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking
for a job?
ABBOTT: Bingo. 
COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and
the easier of the two is to have people stop looking for work.
ABBOTT: Now you’re thinking like a Democrat. 
COSTELLO: I don’t even know what the hell I just said! 
ABBOTT: Now you’re thinking like Hillary

GOODBYE, REAGANS...AND THANK YOU

DELUSIONAL LIBTARDS, IT'S THE LAW...

10 Questions That Liberals NEED to Answer About Their Delusions

Here are ten questions for liberals. 

1. Why do you support open borders for America, but not for the Democratic National Convention? 

Were I to go to Philadelphia in July and attempt to cross the “border” from the sidewalk into the Wells Fargo Center, I would be met by border guards. The guards would demand to see my credentials. I would need to prove that I am a “citizen” or member of the Democratic party and that I am a delegate or have some other reason for crossing the border into the convention. 

Were I to climb the wall and force my way through a window, I would be considered an illegal delegate. No one, they say, is illegal. 

2. Why do you pretend to oppose racial segregation?

Liberal presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is a vociferous opponent of racism. Yet he lives in Vermont, one of whitest states in the union. Vermont is 95.5% white and 1.5% black. 

Privileged white liberals typically live in insulated white suburbs isolated from the violent crime inherent to most black housing projects. 

What’s more, non-white liberals often racially segregate themselves. Participants in the waning college cry-baby movement isolate themselves in so-called safe spaces. No whites allowed. 

3. Why do you pretend to hate hate groups but embrace Islam?

Last I checked there were 27,916 documented terror attacks committed by the religion of peace since Sept. 11, 2001. The number of violent racial hate crimes known to be approbated by the Ku Klux Klan during that same period is zero. 

Islam is the largest, oldest, and deadliest hate group in existence. 

4. Why do you pretend to advocate women’s rights, then trash the 1950s housewife?

The 1940s housewife cared for her home and family as did the 1950s housewife. The same is true of the 1930s housewife, the 19th century housewife, and virtually every adult woman since the onset of humanity. By ridiculing the 1950s housewife, feminidiots are attacking nearly all of womanhood since the beginning of time. 

5. Why do you rail against date rape, but turn a blind eye to hordes of Muslim migrants who attack women in Europe?

It seems a bit hypocritical that liberals would rage against college kids smooching after a night of partying, but ignore the grotesque misogyny of Islam. Islam views Muslim women as property and non-Muslim women as spoils of war. Both are physically and sexually abused at will. 

6. Why do you pretend to be multicultural, but exclude cultures you don’t like?

Liberals love to embrace non-Western cultures as a policy of inclusion. Yet they actively defend the massive destruction of Western Europe by the ongoing Islamic invasion. Liberals also love to hate Southern culture; demonizing the once-benign Confederate flag at every opportunity. They disrespect Confederate icons and disinter their cultural heroes. 

7. Why do you pretend black lives matter while ignoring 13,000 black Christians slaughtered by Muslims in Nigeria in the past 15 years?

It appears the only black lives that matter to the regressive left are those black lives that can be exploited to advance cultural Marxism. 

During the lynching era (1882 — 1968), 4,743 Americans were lynched of whom 1,297 were white and 3,446 were black. However, liberals don’t care about 13,000 black Christians murdered by Islam in one nation in 15 years.

8. Why do you complain that blacks are over-represented in prison but don’t mind that males are over-represented in prison?

37 percent of the prison population is black while only 13 percent of the general population is black. That, liberals complain, is due to racism.

2,096,300 males are currently incarcerated in American prisons; more than ten times the 201,200 females incarcerated. Using liberal logic, would that not constitute sexism?

9. Why do you insist income disparity causes of black crime, then complain of the income disparity between men and women? Wouldn’t income disparity between genders cause women to commit more violent crime than men?

Liberals complain that women earn about 79 cents for every dollar earned by men. They fail to note that men work 41.1 hours per week while women work 36.4 hours per week. What’s  more, women are more likely to choose different career paths than men; paths that frequently include part-time employment that pays less.

10. Why do you ignore black-on-white violent crime?

Exploiting black victims of violence — even those killed in self defense, such as Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown — is an immutable doctrine of the cultural Marxism cult.  

While the names of Martin and Brown have been ingrained in our national conscience, hardly anyone recognizes the name Philip Chism. Chism was the fourteen-year-old black high school student who brutally raped then fatally stabbed his 24-year-old white math teacher. 

Chism received a life sentence for the heinous crime in which he raped his teacher in a high school restroom, killed her, stuffed her naked body in trash bin, then wheeled the bin to a remote location to dispose of the young woman’s remains. After the crime, Chism changed clothes and went to the movies, compliments of his victim’s credit card. 

Dead and forgotten by the regressive left is a dedicated teacher, Colleen Ritzer
================================================================================
Subject: It's the law... and there you have it!

THIS ISN'T RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY STUFF - THIS IS U.S.LAW!
 <https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title18/html/USCODE-2011-title18-partI-chap101-sec2071.htm> https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title18/html/USCODE-2011-title18-partI-chap101-sec2071.htm

This MUST Be Passed On To Every American Voter By November 8, 2016

Federal Law: Title 18. Section 2071

Can it be any clearer?

Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only was Hillary Clinton's private e-mail server illegal, it "disqualifies" her from holding any federal office.  Such as, say, President of the United States?

"If you do this, you've essentially disqualified yourself from being the leader of the free world," said Mukasey, referring to the illegal server and the illegal handling of classified materials by the former Secretary of State and Democrat Presidential candidate.

Mukasey specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here's what that says:

(a) Whomever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so, takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whomever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his or her office and be disqualified from holding any elective office within the United States of America. As used in this subsection, the term "office" does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States of America."

Yes, it explicitly states "shall forfeit his or her office and be disqualified from holding any elective office within the United States of America."
================================================================================

Lets' check out The Trumpster's presidential referrals...

The Obama is against Trump... Check
The Media is against Trump... Check
The Democrats are against Trump... Check
The Republicans Are against Trump... Check
The Pope is against Trump... Check
China is against Trump... Check
Mexico is against Trump... Check

Best qualifications Ever!!

Bonuses points!!
Cher says she will leave the country...
Whoopi says she will leave the country...
Rosi says she will leave the country...
Sharpton says he will leave the country...

Miley Cyrus says she will leave the country...

My Vote for Trump... Check
Perfect...

THE NUMBERS DON'T ADD UP

FROM LORRA OF PANTHERVILLE...

Suddenly 85 million a year in savings is important to Obutthead when we are dealing with 19 trillion in debt, soon to be 20 trillion.  What a joke.  He is doing this because he wants his muslim buddies free. 

Good piece,colonel; factual, solid, well written.  It will drive the liberal crazy!

February 25, 2016

Countering Obama's Argument for Closing Guantanamo

By Jim Waurishuk

First and foremost, the simple argument that Guantanamo (Gitmo) is the number-one recruitment tool for radical Islam is false.  The intelligence community does not support the idea of Gitmo used as a recruitment tool.  If it were true, why would this White House want to transfer the detainees to super-max prisons in the U.S.?  If so, wouldn't those super-max prisons then become the target and topic of radical recruitment?  And if not, why not?  Is there a difference?  The detainees would still be held under U.S. control in U.S. facilities – the only difference is that they are being transferred and held at different location, now on the U.S. mainland.

The primary recruitment for radical Islam and its ideology is fundamental Islam.

The president's announcement was simply not factual, and it was and continues to be irresponsible.  It stems from a campaign promise that he had no business making in the first place, as a candidate does not have access to the intricacies of such an issue.

In response to Mr. Obama's Four Points on Closing Guantanamo:

1. Safeguarding U.S. national security by coordinating with foreign countries to take on prisoners, and that Guantanamo is just as much a recruitment tool for terrorists, and moreover makes those nations accomplices and targets for radical Islamic terrorism.

A. Transferring prisoners to their home, or third party, countries without assurances is an equally a mistake and danger.

B. My experience as deputy director for intelligence at U.S. CENTCOM is that home or third-party countries will not guarantee anything if terrorist detainees are returned.  Most terrorists will likely be released – there are no assurances that those countries will be compliant with U.S. wishes and will anticipate pressure from groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other terrorist groups and entities.

C) No interrogation of jihadist prisoners on the battlefield by police agencies in Europe and by other intelligence sources has revealed that Gitmo is a recruitment tool.  This is a fabricated argument put in play by the Obama administration and other nations and organizations sympathetic to Islamists.  It is foremost a propaganda message, initiated by al-Qaeda and other radical Islamists to influence various political groups to pressure the U.S. government, primarily the Democratic party and the Obama administration, to release all detainees from Gitmo.  Furthermore, it spurs Cuba, Russia, and other politically driven and international supporters to influence the White House and those members of Congress who support the president to close Gitmo and return the facility to the Castro government.

2. Identify prisoners that pose a threat.  This is essentially an issue dealing with the "recidivism rate" of radical Islamists.  This topic should really be discussed in a separate forum.  However, it is worth mentioning that a jihadist who is captured and released has, per his culture, a responsibility to return to jihad.  To do otherwise is to renounce Islam and incur total damnation, shame, and most likely death.

A. All detainees do pose a threat and were identified on the battlefield as such.  Gitmo has been known as the Who's Who of Terrorists.

B. This is the only place where we can hold unlawful combatants, non-uniformed battlefield combatants, and enemies of the United States, as they do not represent a country.  The Geneva Conventions apply only to uniformed combatants from sovereign nations.

3. Use legal tools to process those in the middle of legal proceedings.

A. Legal tools are and always have been in use.

B. Within the facility is a fully staffed United Nations office and a center for legal defenders to work.

4. Military commissions are costly, because the situation has been politicized by the White House.

A. These prisoners are not protected by the Geneva Conventions, as the conventions apply to uniformed members.

B. Bringing detainees into U.S. courts cannot apply, as the evidence used for those caught on the battlefield in Afghanistan and Iraq and other countries involved in the Global War on Terror cannot be used in civilian courts.

Other considerations:

Guantanamo Naval Base is more than a terrorist detention facility.  It is an operational U.S. naval deepwater naval port facility.

The standard process to close an overseas base and transfer it back to the country to which it exists and is located is a five- to ten-year process.  And that's the process for returning military facilities to allied nations.  It requires a base closure commission and authority from Congress.  It involves and affects multiple agency budgets and appropriations, coordination, international legal proceedings, etc.  The U.S. has been there since the late 1800s, and as an official U.S. naval facility since 1903.

Jim Waurishuk is a retired USAF colonel and a 30-year career senior intelligence and political-military affairs officer.  He served as a special mission intelligence officer for various special operations units and organizations; with the CIA's Asymmetric Warfare Task Force; as deputy director for intelligence for U.S. Central Command (U.S. CENTCOM); as a former White House National Security Council staffer; and as a former distinguished senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, Washington, D.C.  He lives in Tampa Bay, Fla.

=================================================================================

The Great Math Makeover: This Numbers Game Doesn't Add Up By Guy Christopher This is for all of us who have had our fill of orchestrated government and media rewrites of history, facts, and figures... Propagandists learned long ago utilizing dishonest, politically motivated "journalists" to write the "first draft of history" was more efficient than book-fueled bonfires in the village square. None were better at spreading lies than Adolf Hitler's propaganda wizard, Joseph Goebbels. His formula set the modern standard – keep the lie simple, repeat it often and it will be believed. "It would not be impossible to prove," boasted Goebbels, "that a square is in fact a circle." Add price, value, volume, distance, speed, and time to geometric squares and circles – all governed by the science of applied mathematics. Outrageous lies are too often exposed by logic and common sense, so financial tyrants must rewrite, redefine, rinse, and repeat the math to turn Goebbels' squares into circles. When you hear government numbers, keep in mind what's not reported: - Official Unemployment Rates You're officially unemployed only if you're busy looking for a job. The math makeover of counting unemployed "doesn't capture all of the people (now 92+ million) sitting on the sidelines in despair of finding a job," said the man who once ran the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Not reported: The true unemployment damage to American families matches that of the 1930's Great Depression. Hardly ever mentioned, the correct math would add the millions on the sidelines to the millions of those looking, bringing the true total to 101+ million Americans now unemployed. - Official National Debt The admitted national debt now over $19 trillion ignores another $200+ trillion in foreseeable government debt (unfunded liabilities). Uncounted trillions more in legally invisible banking and Wall Street derivative debt obligations threaten the entire world's financial structure. Not reported: Tell your kids to start saving their allowances to pay for your nation's borrowing and spending. - Official Gross Domestic Product Calculated as the total value of all goods and services, GDP math has been revised to include estimated future values of primarily intellectual products, like copyrights, research proposals, and industrial blueprints. On paper, this math makeover raised national output overnight by 3% and lowered government borrowing costs by 2%. In Europe, revised national economic output calculations now include estimated values of black market economies like prostitution, drug traffic, and arms deals. Not reported: Hopes and dreams were suddenly assigned billions in value without a dollar changing hands.                   - Official Inflation Rates Inflation costs rise every moment of your life. Governments get "first use" of the money they print. You pay higher prices as a stealth tax when the new paper builds up in circulation. You cope with higher prices by choosing hamburger over steak, by paying the same price for smaller packaging, or by going without. This planned theft of your wealth is now 103 years in the making. Not reported: None other than former chief money printer Alan Greenspan wrote in 1966, "In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to prevent confiscation of savings through inflation." - Official Gold Reserves The U.S. government claims 8,133.5 metric tons of gold held at different repositories, including Fort Knox. It's the largest officially claimed stash in the world. Not reported: Experts constantly question the official math. After decades of storing gold for other nations and under-the-table gold swaps, after 60 years without a proper, public audit, the right question is – even if the gold is there, who owns it? - Official Gold Prices Gold and silver fiat prices worldwide are fixed by a cartel of bullion and central banks. That fix works by flooding the market with imaginary supplies of paper promises in the form of gold market futures and options. True supply and demand of physical metal is criminally ignored in the paper money price. Not reported: The true paper money values of gold and silver are the most dangerous numbers to government. That's the math government must absolutely control to hold power. The current scheme of suppressing gold's paper price is not the first, and likely not the last. Each price suppression scheme in the past has failed because the gold backing paper promises ran out. The current scheme will fail also. Evidence is mounting gold is now running short as promises soar. January 2016 data presented by Craig Hemke of TFMetals Report, a recent Money Metals podcast guest, shows each ounce of bullion bank gold for sale has been promised to 542 different buyers. That's up from 100 different buyers, a number that itself raised some eyebrows when it was admitted in government hearings just five years ago. Croupiers in propaganda casinos haven't run the table yet, which helps explain the historic voter push-back against entrenched politicians and bureaucracies in both major political parties. The American Customer Satisfaction Index shows confidence and trust in government mired in the lowest layers of slimy muck. Quoting the head of that research, "It's much more difficult to govern if the entire population dislikes you." The one mathematical truth that cannot be made over – it's not the gram or ounce of gold and silver that ever changes. It's the manipulated interpretation of the metal's paper value that constantly changes. The precious metal in your hand carries the same steady confidence as the primary store of wealth it has carried for thousands of years. Government and media lies to steal your wealth and your liberty will keep coming from the right and the left, flying hot and heavy. Depend on your own logic and common sense – and do your OWN math.

Verdana Currently in plain text mode. Switch to rich text. Recheck Checking... Send               Saved